If you’re charging corporate clients, then it’s inevitable that you’ll need to use the Uniform Task-Based Management System (UTBMS) code system. It was a standard developed to set rates for the tasks charged by firms. This coding system is a part of the Legal Electronic Data Exchange Standard (LEDES), which was developed by several law firms and corporate clients. It’s essentially a classification system for billing that allows your clients to know more details about their invoices. As I mentioned in my previous article—The Options of Syncing your Calendar, Contacts, and Mail—standards are important for collaborating between different systems.
Recently though, in the midst of everything else happening in
the world, they updated the UTBMS codes. They specifically expanded the activity and
expense codes. For those of us not familiar with these codes, an activity code
(A-code) further describes a litigation code (L-code). It’s a code that allows
your firm to give more information about how much each part of the process
cost the corporate entity. Since the litigation codes are categories of the
legal process (case assessment, trail proceedings, etc.), the activity codes describe
the various aspects in each of those categories (research, draft, etc.). The expanded
activity codes include medical records and billing management (A115),
processing (A120), and exhibit creation (A126). Altogether they added sixteen more to the activity
codes.
Similar to activity codes, they added more detailed expense
codes, except they also switched the notation from E-codes to X-codes. These
additional codes account for housing costs, such as eviction (X118) and foreclosure
costs (X119), intellectual property (X200-207), eDiscovery (X300-X308), as well
as medical record (X130) and analysis (X131) costs. Furthermore, they reserved
a hundred codes (X900-X998) to be designated by the user. The standard was
changed at the end of this year and we can expect to see the industry to begin
using the X-codes within the next year. Altogether they added more than forty
more codes to expense codes.
No comments:
Post a Comment